For several years, my boss’ boss walked into my office and told me to be an outlaw-rebel-maverick. I thanked her, that was clearly not what she wanted. But what does she expect from a person who often unbranded strayed from the flock? As I recall this particular issue to give to me the idea, called a PC on every desktop and just accept a few shared resources that would be raised in a public area. I’m not kidding. The forces that had wanted to put two “personal” computer in a room for 30 + people to share. The absurdity of such a request was these leaders that a terminal view to the mainframe processing of all the computing power needed (Pun completely intended) was held has been lost. In the year 1984 (no joke), I stood up and said we should in which each bit processing power of their own. We should be the mainframe network, our individual achievements as long as a faster more efficient method is developed share. And everyone in the company should an e-mail address. The level of outrage and defiance of the executive branch that was ruled down on me only by the number of people who lost their jobs because the company struggled to compete with her in the use of outdated, slow reaction, the more expensive central computer systems , locked up the vote in a vast expanse squeaky clean. While I do not lose my job over this, which drove git wasted resources and missed opportunities from those who wanted only along like little dogie me and every other outlaw-rebel-maverick, that stayed with this company, from embracing. Years later I was by a group of trail bosses asked me by this organization, approached the door again to join the team, to help them find new ways and greener pastures. I did not know they committed. As Gomer Pyle once warned: “Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice shame on me.” This wisdom was well observed that for the short session after the adjustment, the company imploded. The point is, are those of you (or were once) outlaw-rebel-mavericks should never give up your independent spirit in the name of team unity. If you do not agree with the direction of the team that you have an obligation to the larger organization to stand your ground until you convinced that they are the better way, or they are convinced that you are, or it may be an alternative solution will be found on which you all agree. If the team goes without your consent and all goes well, it’s okay to admit you were wrong, but should not prevent you from getting up the next time. When things go wrong is serious in its approach, say anything, only help to resolve it. If they are successful, you go your way to share the honor with the team. If your path leads to disaster, to accept the defeat to find the cause, to fix the problem and adjust your thinking accordingly. You may have to work twice as hard to convince them to your next proposal merit, but your integrity will be uncontested. Those of you who do not outlaw-rebel-mavericks should be by those who are to learn. Do not be afraid to ask questions about your. Challenge the prevailing opinion, regardless of its source. be heard, not in flocks. Of course, if you simply agree with the direction of the team, then you have to realize still that contribute to situations where no “I” in team no excuse for taking your eye off of innovation and improvement.
No Blind Aye in Team
BL Lindstrom is a highly paid and sought after systems janitor and author in multiple media. His latest communication can still be found on his blog Authorian Adventures in the ether, so I wrote this book. To learn more about his work, which you can visit BL Lindstrom know.